Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-29 11:51:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Imperial College London Research paper ’concluded “ULEZ on its own was not effective in the sense that the marginal effects caused by the ULEZ on improving air quality were small, either at particular locations or averaging across London”. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30c1

Written by BBFE90AA3AD1213C814900B1031635B6782773EFD3B4523C351FD7273DA94418
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1685217171482251264

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1685256763933675520
  • noteId - 1685256763933675520
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BBFE90AA3AD1213C814900B1031635B6782773EFD3B4523C351FD7273DA94418 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1690631497737
  • tweetId - 1685217171482251264
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Imperial College London Research paper ’concluded “ULEZ on its own was not effective in the sense that the marginal effects caused by the ULEZ on improving air quality were small, either at particular locations or averaging across London”. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30c1

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-29 11:51:37 UTC
(1690631497737)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-30 02:15:25 UTC
(1690683325061)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-29 19:13:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 17:53:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 17:25:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 17:20:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 17:05:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 15:42:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 15:37:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 15:26:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 15:18:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 15:15:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 15:12:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 14:35:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 13:57:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 13:22:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 13:06:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 12:35:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 09:52:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 09:29:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 08:47:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 08:40:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 08:00:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 07:29:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 07:24:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 07:14:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 07:12:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 07:00:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 06:57:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 06:56:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 02:51:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 02:34:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 02:18:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 02:01:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 00:34:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 22:15:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 20:51:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-29 20:02:30 -0500 Rating Details