Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-30 07:51:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1334D4F4750C1E14529D69668C42A16E4C77D8798A0EB5D26A17CFF2A260135
Participant Details

Original Note:

Imperial College London Research paper ’concluded “ULEZ on its own was not effective in the sense that the marginal effects caused by the ULEZ on improving air quality were small, either at particular locations or averaging across London”. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30c1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685256763933675520
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1334D4F4750C1E14529D69668C42A16E4C77D8798A0EB5D26A17CFF2A260135
  • createdAtMillis - 1690703504005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685256763933675520F1334D4F4750C1E14529D69668C42A16E4C77D8798A0EB5D26A17CFF2A260135