Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 13:00:58 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 344E353F58F2A1C8AE6279DD433E287E194511E529D3F7353725D3B0600B7124
Participant Details

Original Note:

Imperial College London Research paper ’concluded “ULEZ on its own was not effective in the sense that the marginal effects caused by the ULEZ on improving air quality were small, either at particular locations or averaging across London”. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30c1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685256763933675520
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 344E353F58F2A1C8AE6279DD433E287E194511E529D3F7353725D3B0600B7124
  • createdAtMillis - 1690635658824
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685256763933675520344E353F58F2A1C8AE6279DD433E287E194511E529D3F7353725D3B0600B7124