Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 22:05:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0EEB44C3CE341DF0892871BCDB55DB0E1C406F4D8668001E5F01A4DBCD5AA93
Participant Details

Original Note:

Imperial College London Research paper ’concluded “ULEZ on its own was not effective in the sense that the marginal effects caused by the ULEZ on improving air quality were small, either at particular locations or averaging across London”. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30c1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685256763933675520
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0EEB44C3CE341DF0892871BCDB55DB0E1C406F4D8668001E5F01A4DBCD5AA93
  • createdAtMillis - 1690668301550
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685256763933675520A0EEB44C3CE341DF0892871BCDB55DB0E1C406F4D8668001E5F01A4DBCD5AA93