Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 20:18:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEC163D767E1C1DA2B5477334463AE924CD393A6C6A6319B945454F64B60A562
Participant Details

Original Note:

Imperial College London Research paper ’concluded “ULEZ on its own was not effective in the sense that the marginal effects caused by the ULEZ on improving air quality were small, either at particular locations or averaging across London”. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30c1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1685256763933675520
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEC163D767E1C1DA2B5477334463AE924CD393A6C6A6319B945454F64B60A562
  • createdAtMillis - 1690661902893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1685256763933675520CEC163D767E1C1DA2B5477334463AE924CD393A6C6A6319B945454F64B60A562