Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-14 08:19:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Misleading: This Mailchimp piece applies only part of the standard ARIMA timeseries technique to only part of the data. The series in neither linear nor described by MA alone. ARIMA technique is regarded as inadequate for climate projection. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-023-25148-9

Written by 4272D05B42A08AB8C6008642439D60FAEEDA03045EABB903B5FA49B9BEF25462
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1679622241883963404

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1679767659477450757
  • noteId - 1679767659477450757
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4272D05B42A08AB8C6008642439D60FAEEDA03045EABB903B5FA49B9BEF25462 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689322793250
  • tweetId - 1679622241883963404
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Misleading: This Mailchimp piece applies only part of the standard ARIMA timeseries technique to only part of the data. The series in neither linear nor described by MA alone. ARIMA technique is regarded as inadequate for climate projection. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-023-25148-9

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-14 08:19:53 UTC
(1689322793250)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-15 05:11:15 UTC
(1689397875149)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-14 16:42:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 15:02:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 14:31:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 11:42:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 07:36:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 03:47:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 21:55:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 20:10:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 19:47:02 -0500 Rating Details