Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-14 20:02:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3DC8FDC475E23ED5BE5E525ED52E66D7707D1A5B04912ABB6E9FAC3A47B6B409
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading: This Mailchimp piece applies only part of the standard ARIMA timeseries technique to only part of the data. The series in neither linear nor described by MA alone. ARIMA technique is regarded as inadequate for climate projection. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-023-25148-9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1679767659477450757
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 3DC8FDC475E23ED5BE5E525ED52E66D7707D1A5B04912ABB6E9FAC3A47B6B409
createdAtMillis - 1689364922177
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16797676594774507573DC8FDC475E23ED5BE5E525ED52E66D7707D1A5B04912ABB6E9FAC3A47B6B409