Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-15 01:10:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4698D6E4528E664B4EFA24DB0DE04BACF2CBC361AD3BC5BB4A98F183280C376
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading: This Mailchimp piece applies only part of the standard ARIMA timeseries technique to only part of the data. The series in neither linear nor described by MA alone. ARIMA technique is regarded as inadequate for climate projection. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-023-25148-9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679767659477450757
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4698D6E4528E664B4EFA24DB0DE04BACF2CBC361AD3BC5BB4A98F183280C376
  • createdAtMillis - 1689383441022
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1679767659477450757C4698D6E4528E664B4EFA24DB0DE04BACF2CBC361AD3BC5BB4A98F183280C376