Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-14 08:47:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 286D996B7047FC6D6DA947E8D21266E4AF5810B613D38CAA8C150B4C6FDAF548
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading: This Mailchimp piece applies only part of the standard ARIMA timeseries technique to only part of the data. The series in neither linear nor described by MA alone. ARIMA technique is regarded as inadequate for climate projection. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-023-25148-9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679767659477450757
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 286D996B7047FC6D6DA947E8D21266E4AF5810B613D38CAA8C150B4C6FDAF548
  • createdAtMillis - 1689324424707
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1679767659477450757286D996B7047FC6D6DA947E8D21266E4AF5810B613D38CAA8C150B4C6FDAF548