Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-15 02:55:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11038F01FF577160743F1B7CA6A09A927F78CD3F9D7651EB0D4700684E728EB5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading: This Mailchimp piece applies only part of the standard ARIMA timeseries technique to only part of the data. The series in neither linear nor described by MA alone. ARIMA technique is regarded as inadequate for climate projection. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-023-25148-9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679767659477450757
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11038F01FF577160743F1B7CA6A09A927F78CD3F9D7651EB0D4700684E728EB5
  • createdAtMillis - 1689389756420
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167976765947745075711038F01FF577160743F1B7CA6A09A927F78CD3F9D7651EB0D4700684E728EB5