Birdwatch Note
2023-06-21 16:37:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
"Predictive accuracy from the neural network was 61% in each gender." That is marginally better than guessing. Furthermore, the database was trained by only 60 people and they do not specify who these people are (sex, age, ethnicity, country of origin). It's a bad study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093501/
Written by 1C0C9BFDE27E138484601F927673F3BB3D226F5BA3765FAA44370E63061948BC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1670610489221566472
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1671558086761349120
- noteId - 1671558086761349120
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1C0C9BFDE27E138484601F927673F3BB3D226F5BA3765FAA44370E63061948BC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687365478588
- tweetId - 1670610489221566472
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- "Predictive accuracy from the neural network was 61% in each gender." That is marginally better than guessing. Furthermore, the database was trained by only 60 people and they do not specify who these people are (sex, age, ethnicity, country of origin). It's a bad study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093501/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-21 16:37:58 UTC (1687365478588) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-22 02:11:12 UTC (1687399872183) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-21 19:07:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 18:06:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 17:59:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 16:26:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 12:06:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 11:59:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 11:53:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 11:50:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 11:47:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-21 11:41:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 14:27:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 09:52:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 07:29:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 05:06:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 02:57:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 02:33:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 01:29:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 00:51:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-22 00:32:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-24 18:31:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-25 03:39:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 19:38:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-26 11:11:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-26 09:56:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-26 10:27:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-21 05:42:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-20 11:03:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-20 10:15:12 -0500 | Rating Details |