Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 07:57:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 815D8CC2B80CA5872638F266D7D264AF43F2142EC507DA154872C11274B92FAA
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Predictive accuracy from the neural network was 61% in each gender." That is marginally better than guessing. Furthermore, the database was trained by only 60 people and they do not specify who these people are (sex, age, ethnicity, country of origin). It's a bad study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093501/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671558086761349120
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 815D8CC2B80CA5872638F266D7D264AF43F2142EC507DA154872C11274B92FAA
  • createdAtMillis - 1687420643979
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671558086761349120815D8CC2B80CA5872638F266D7D264AF43F2142EC507DA154872C11274B92FAA