Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-25 08:39:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2994B53424EC152AF08FA4F9A247C49A20E33CCE99C0287F8FE30C65B2DF06A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Predictive accuracy from the neural network was 61% in each gender." That is marginally better than guessing. Furthermore, the database was trained by only 60 people and they do not specify who these people are (sex, age, ethnicity, country of origin). It's a bad study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093501/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671558086761349120
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2994B53424EC152AF08FA4F9A247C49A20E33CCE99C0287F8FE30C65B2DF06A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1687682354903
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16715580867613491202994B53424EC152AF08FA4F9A247C49A20E33CCE99C0287F8FE30C65B2DF06A9