Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-21 23:06:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FC212F96BFD74EE2823E8A16E383F983D176F080DAC493ADB949AA3DE39CC553
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Predictive accuracy from the neural network was 61% in each gender." That is marginally better than guessing. Furthermore, the database was trained by only 60 people and they do not specify who these people are (sex, age, ethnicity, country of origin). It's a bad study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093501/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671558086761349120
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FC212F96BFD74EE2823E8A16E383F983D176F080DAC493ADB949AA3DE39CC553
  • createdAtMillis - 1687388765704
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671558086761349120FC212F96BFD74EE2823E8A16E383F983D176F080DAC493ADB949AA3DE39CC553