Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 05:32:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97C4EA7DAE78368FAA293E51DF3C48DF1766FB90D885FD05DB19E1D39DE7FCA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Predictive accuracy from the neural network was 61% in each gender." That is marginally better than guessing. Furthermore, the database was trained by only 60 people and they do not specify who these people are (sex, age, ethnicity, country of origin). It's a bad study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10093501/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671558086761349120
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97C4EA7DAE78368FAA293E51DF3C48DF1766FB90D885FD05DB19E1D39DE7FCA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1687411935268
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167155808676134912097C4EA7DAE78368FAA293E51DF3C48DF1766FB90D885FD05DB19E1D39DE7FCA4