Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-15 00:33:18 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Whether or not Adam Schiff's tweet is hypocritical, or perceived as such, has no relevance to the contents of the tweet. This is an example of the "tu quoque" fallacy. https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#TuQuoque It is also worth noting that Schiff uses the wording "appears to," which constitutes an opinion.

Written by FFF2BD308F06B380463BB4D358B9FDC75988184B0FD51EC2D74DDF6F67ECABF9
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1657906970584653824
• noteId - 1657906970584653824
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - FFF2BD308F06B380463BB4D358B9FDC75988184B0FD51EC2D74DDF6F67ECABF9 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1684110798867
• tweetId - 1657475388153446404
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• Whether or not Adam Schiff's tweet is hypocritical, or perceived as such, has no relevance to the contents of the tweet. This is an example of the "tu quoque" fallacy. https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#TuQuoque It is also worth noting that Schiff uses the wording "appears to," which constitutes an opinion.