Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 14:28:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 801EF47667BB4A265482C460A08B6BB8CD8D4399730F8E355209F79C3722D4ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whether or not Adam Schiff's tweet is hypocritical, or perceived as such, has no relevance to the contents of the tweet. This is an example of the "tu quoque" fallacy. https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#TuQuoque It is also worth noting that Schiff uses the wording "appears to," which constitutes an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657906970584653824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 801EF47667BB4A265482C460A08B6BB8CD8D4399730F8E355209F79C3722D4ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1685370484465
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1657906970584653824801EF47667BB4A265482C460A08B6BB8CD8D4399730F8E355209F79C3722D4ED