Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 16:20:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 368F223499770F024A9B41911CE6436483A44961F195533CDAB5A077A88C41B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whether or not Adam Schiff's tweet is hypocritical, or perceived as such, has no relevance to the contents of the tweet. This is an example of the "tu quoque" fallacy. https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#TuQuoque It is also worth noting that Schiff uses the wording "appears to," which constitutes an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657906970584653824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 368F223499770F024A9B41911CE6436483A44961F195533CDAB5A077A88C41B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1685377250414
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1657906970584653824368F223499770F024A9B41911CE6436483A44961F195533CDAB5A077A88C41B5