Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 14:27:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1165E2C5E9CFB5915A2155DD41C0F841022D15CE41E2E2CBBD329461D5892D3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whether or not Adam Schiff's tweet is hypocritical, or perceived as such, has no relevance to the contents of the tweet. This is an example of the "tu quoque" fallacy. https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#TuQuoque It is also worth noting that Schiff uses the wording "appears to," which constitutes an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657906970584653824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1165E2C5E9CFB5915A2155DD41C0F841022D15CE41E2E2CBBD329461D5892D3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1685370421847
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16579069705846538241165E2C5E9CFB5915A2155DD41C0F841022D15CE41E2E2CBBD329461D5892D3D