Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 12:07:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6DD62212B01DF312B800E4630181D7FD90E29515B84D8D6EAC4F74D51B3B8ACF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whether or not Adam Schiff's tweet is hypocritical, or perceived as such, has no relevance to the contents of the tweet. This is an example of the "tu quoque" fallacy. https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#TuQuoque It is also worth noting that Schiff uses the wording "appears to," which constitutes an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1657906970584653824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6DD62212B01DF312B800E4630181D7FD90E29515B84D8D6EAC4F74D51B3B8ACF
  • createdAtMillis - 1685362047049
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16579069705846538246DD62212B01DF312B800E4630181D7FD90E29515B84D8D6EAC4F74D51B3B8ACF