Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-02 12:33:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The article supporting the tweet does not support the proposition of an “official blacklist”, as it does not provide any evidence of sanctions or actions taken against the journalists listed. The précis of the journalist positions on the list seem to be accurate at face value.

Written by 4E615590BE04BC0B17BFDBCD570AD7EBB1E9E9BF2799A8530863465D41B432B5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1653015984775495681

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1653377258353197058
  • noteId - 1653377258353197058
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4E615590BE04BC0B17BFDBCD570AD7EBB1E9E9BF2799A8530863465D41B432B5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1683030831314
  • tweetId - 1653015984775495681
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • The article supporting the tweet does not support the proposition of an “official blacklist”, as it does not provide any evidence of sanctions or actions taken against the journalists listed. The précis of the journalist positions on the list seem to be accurate at face value.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-02 12:33:51 UTC
(1683030831314)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-03 15:45:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 02:23:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 01:34:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 13:20:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 09:58:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 09:29:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 09:20:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 09:05:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 08:46:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 08:34:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 07:52:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 07:44:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 07:42:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 07:39:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 09:29:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 01:34:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 07:52:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 09:20:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 13:20:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 09:05:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 02:23:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 07:42:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 07:44:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 15:45:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 08:34:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 07:39:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 09:58:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 08:46:49 -0500 Rating Details