Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 14:29:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D91105FB8D0F392F08FB75B552221D8CF4E40BC254959EB3CE2930DA5E23F2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article supporting the tweet does not support the proposition of an “official blacklist”, as it does not provide any evidence of sanctions or actions taken against the journalists listed. The précis of the journalist positions on the list seem to be accurate at face value.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653377258353197058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D91105FB8D0F392F08FB75B552221D8CF4E40BC254959EB3CE2930DA5E23F2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1683037784568
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16533772583531970585D91105FB8D0F392F08FB75B552221D8CF4E40BC254959EB3CE2930DA5E23F2B