Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 07:23:07 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CBA427D2288013F1C3DEA650AA1CC5D65A04F4F858EBCAE7E49DE30AF1A5B28
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article supporting the tweet does not support the proposition of an “official blacklist”, as it does not provide any evidence of sanctions or actions taken against the journalists listed. The précis of the journalist positions on the list seem to be accurate at face value.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653377258353197058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CBA427D2288013F1C3DEA650AA1CC5D65A04F4F858EBCAE7E49DE30AF1A5B28
  • createdAtMillis - 1683098587058
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16533772583531970588CBA427D2288013F1C3DEA650AA1CC5D65A04F4F858EBCAE7E49DE30AF1A5B28