Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 20:45:13 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C87096D87AAA88974F3E5F33BA1084E61CE65FBCC64D7AE7A8A04CCB9A3B48D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article supporting the tweet does not support the proposition of an “official blacklist”, as it does not provide any evidence of sanctions or actions taken against the journalists listed. The précis of the journalist positions on the list seem to be accurate at face value.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653377258353197058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C87096D87AAA88974F3E5F33BA1084E61CE65FBCC64D7AE7A8A04CCB9A3B48D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1683146713203
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653377258353197058C87096D87AAA88974F3E5F33BA1084E61CE65FBCC64D7AE7A8A04CCB9A3B48D0