Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 12:42:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CC979DC519E344FD4C77F2FD3D25272117BDBF08FAF178AEC7C5D4FF209DBE6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article supporting the tweet does not support the proposition of an “official blacklist”, as it does not provide any evidence of sanctions or actions taken against the journalists listed. The précis of the journalist positions on the list seem to be accurate at face value.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653377258353197058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CC979DC519E344FD4C77F2FD3D25272117BDBF08FAF178AEC7C5D4FF209DBE6
  • createdAtMillis - 1683031339224
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16533772583531970588CC979DC519E344FD4C77F2FD3D25272117BDBF08FAF178AEC7C5D4FF209DBE6