Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-09-10 14:20:15 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Les chiffres du tweet sont issus de travaux controversés relayés par l’organisation antivax ICAN, sans validation scientifique ni méthodologie fiable. L’« étude » mentionnée n’est ni publiée ni reconnue, et ne répond pas aux standards médicaux actuels. https://www.statnews.com/2025/09/09/aaron-siri-smoking-gun-vaccine-chronic-disease-study-flaws/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/10/vaccine-hearing-congress-illness-children https://www.afp.com/fr/infos/une-grande-etude-menee-au-danemark-par-le-statens-serum-institut-ne-revele-aucun-lien-entre

Written by C0E4F4003B48B73EC21DE34E445D64CE2439361F5433B21081B240D1377E0C75
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1965638659819917542

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1965782374102508017
  • noteId - 1965782374102508017
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C0E4F4003B48B73EC21DE34E445D64CE2439361F5433B21081B240D1377E0C75
  • createdAtMillis - 1757514015113
  • tweetId - 1965638659819917542
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Les chiffres du tweet sont issus de travaux controversés relayés par l’organisation antivax ICAN, sans validation scientifique ni méthodologie fiable. L’« étude » mentionnée n’est ni publiée ni reconnue, et ne répond pas aux standards médicaux actuels. https://www.statnews.com/2025/09/09/aaron-siri-smoking-gun-vaccine-chronic-disease-study-flaws/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/10/vaccine-hearing-congress-illness-children https://www.afp.com/fr/infos/une-grande-etude-menee-au-danemark-par-le-statens-serum-institut-ne-revele-aucun-lien-entre

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-09-10 17:56:41 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-10 13:19:48 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-10 11:04:19 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-10 10:55:01 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-10 16:26:29 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-10 10:33:23 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-10 12:24:21 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-10 10:59:48 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-10 11:14:36 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-11 02:15:33 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-10 21:39:21 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-11 03:26:06 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-12 03:26:20 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-16 09:51:13 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-16 16:31:29 -0400 Rating Details
2025-09-17 05:34:51 -0400 Rating Details