Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-20 10:34:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

As a judge, Barrett has never written or suggested that the 14th Amendment is "possibly illegitimate". The quote is from a 2016 article and is missing context. It was part of a wider hypothetical about originalism; then-Professor Barrett did not endorse the idea herself https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1619&context=jcl

Written by C63B1A0B0826A8245BAC53200F268885A1EF7D14E0F403AE7E75020FB9D8FE40
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1858999474422718614

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1859183633044742361
  • noteId - 1859183633044742361
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C63B1A0B0826A8245BAC53200F268885A1EF7D14E0F403AE7E75020FB9D8FE40
  • createdAtMillis - 1732098894737
  • tweetId - 1858999474422718614
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • As a judge, Barrett has never written or suggested that the 14th Amendment is "possibly illegitimate". The quote is from a 2016 article and is missing context. It was part of a wider hypothetical about originalism; then-Professor Barrett did not endorse the idea herself https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1619&context=jcl

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-20 18:10:17 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 17:35:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 14:18:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 13:25:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 12:33:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 12:06:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 11:18:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 10:06:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 09:46:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 09:09:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 08:24:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 07:57:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 07:33:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 05:55:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 16:28:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 11:51:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 08:44:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 17:22:26 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 16:38:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 11:01:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 07:47:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 13:46:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 05:24:23 -0600 Rating Details