Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 17:01:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A873478FC1A69432EDA9391BD75893577DFCBA0F3648799FCCDABFAD0C86AD03
Participant Details

Original Note:

As a judge, Barrett has never written or suggested that the 14th Amendment is "possibly illegitimate". The quote is from a 2016 article and is missing context. It was part of a wider hypothetical about originalism; then-Professor Barrett did not endorse the idea herself https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1619&context=jcl

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859183633044742361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A873478FC1A69432EDA9391BD75893577DFCBA0F3648799FCCDABFAD0C86AD03
  • createdAtMillis - 1732122115006
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859183633044742361A873478FC1A69432EDA9391BD75893577DFCBA0F3648799FCCDABFAD0C86AD03