Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 19:46:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0C62778C39AA1C735804FDCB0038BACB351FE20B9671A92E87B17DB5E3C2740
Participant Details

Original Note:

As a judge, Barrett has never written or suggested that the 14th Amendment is "possibly illegitimate". The quote is from a 2016 article and is missing context. It was part of a wider hypothetical about originalism; then-Professor Barrett did not endorse the idea herself https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1619&context=jcl

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859183633044742361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0C62778C39AA1C735804FDCB0038BACB351FE20B9671A92E87B17DB5E3C2740
  • createdAtMillis - 1732131961774
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1859183633044742361C0C62778C39AA1C735804FDCB0038BACB351FE20B9671A92E87B17DB5E3C2740