Birdwatch Note
2024-11-05 00:43:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Vox, an openly biased source, notes that this study is also biased. "But ideally, in a study about bias, the authors wouldn’t be using data they themselves assembled." Also, CN is an Ambiguity Fallacy: as a case to outlaw free speech would itself, be a free speech case. https://www.vox.com/2014/5/6/5684270/epstein-parker-segal-supreme-court-free-speech-study-do-justices-defend-the-speech-they-hate
Written by 16231E7FD07F6D4B775364E6E682F0F380D17B7A954D55DF51BB7B4BB2EC8E90
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853303465637818447
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853599049439424554
- noteId - 1853599049439424554
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 16231E7FD07F6D4B775364E6E682F0F380D17B7A954D55DF51BB7B4BB2EC8E90 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730767426249
- tweetId - 1853303465637818447
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Vox, an openly biased source, notes that this study is also biased. "But ideally, in a study about bias, the authors wouldn’t be using data they themselves assembled." Also, CN is an Ambiguity Fallacy: as a case to outlaw free speech would itself, be a free speech case. https://www.vox.com/2014/5/6/5684270/epstein-parker-segal-supreme-court-free-speech-study-do-justices-defend-the-speech-they-hate
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-04 18:44:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 18:30:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 10:45:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 09:13:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 06:44:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 05:17:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 22:39:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 22:36:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 21:00:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 19:59:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 19:19:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 18:46:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 01:19:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 00:17:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 23:55:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 12:53:04 -0600 | Rating Details |