Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-11-05 03:00:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 39FA87B948931264B6E619F58FCFDB75B004E83E19BEC9D843E66FA0F1008D03
Participant Details
Original Note:
Vox, an openly biased source, notes that this study is also biased. "But ideally, in a study about bias, the authors wouldn’t be using data they themselves assembled." Also, CN is an Ambiguity Fallacy: as a case to outlaw free speech would itself, be a free speech case. https://www.vox.com/2014/5/6/5684270/epstein-parker-segal-supreme-court-free-speech-study-do-justices-defend-the-speech-they-hate
All Note Details