Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-11-05 00:46:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2D509D422DD284757572BC8BF44022B9E8B9D353FB7A5E913D3F276CD82EDD2A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Vox, an openly biased source, notes that this study is also biased. "But ideally, in a study about bias, the authors wouldn’t be using data they themselves assembled." Also, CN is an Ambiguity Fallacy: as a case to outlaw free speech would itself, be a free speech case. https://www.vox.com/2014/5/6/5684270/epstein-parker-segal-supreme-court-free-speech-study-do-justices-defend-the-speech-they-hate
All Note Details