Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-11-05 16:45:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 862A5C3E6FDB42AD277EA2C1A62EA31148CB6E48BE299527F255BFB025D08F04
Participant Details
Original Note:
Vox, an openly biased source, notes that this study is also biased. "But ideally, in a study about bias, the authors wouldn’t be using data they themselves assembled." Also, CN is an Ambiguity Fallacy: as a case to outlaw free speech would itself, be a free speech case. https://www.vox.com/2014/5/6/5684270/epstein-parker-segal-supreme-court-free-speech-study-do-justices-defend-the-speech-they-hate
All Note Details