Birdwatch Note
2024-10-23 11:58:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Une personne du comité d'éthique de l'AMU prétend que l'IHU n'a connu que 10 rétractations et 220 articles réhabilités. Or, il y a déjà 27 rétractations https://ihu-correction.com/?author=&journal=&irb=&funded=&retracted=on et plus de 400 articles qui sont sous investigation. Ses conclusions ne préjugent pas des décisions éditoriales Comme ici : https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312324
Written by F070DD99104D700DEB8C8B3F0341A655BB0240AE7F21D70053F43FE5A1618116
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848944966300537309
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1849057866948268128
- noteId - 1849057866948268128
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F070DD99104D700DEB8C8B3F0341A655BB0240AE7F21D70053F43FE5A1618116
- createdAtMillis - 1729684723972
- tweetId - 1848944966300537309
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Une personne du comité d'éthique de l'AMU prétend que l'IHU n'a connu que 10 rétractations et 220 articles réhabilités. Or, il y a déjà 27 rétractations https://ihu-correction.com/?author=&journal=&irb=&funded=&retracted=on et plus de 400 articles qui sont sous investigation. Ses conclusions ne préjugent pas des décisions éditoriales Comme ici : https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312324
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-24 02:02:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 14:52:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 09:57:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 09:03:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 03:17:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-24 03:10:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 07:05:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 07:16:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 07:11:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 16:36:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 16:20:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 12:12:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 08:16:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 07:05:23 -0500 | Rating Details |