Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 13:16:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C64FA06D535847CD20BB4E816FD8A000EDB440C26D564BDB6EACFBB665781C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Une personne du comité d'éthique de l'AMU prétend que l'IHU n'a connu que 10 rétractations et 220 articles réhabilités. Or, il y a déjà 27 rétractations https://ihu-correction.com/?author=&journal=&irb=&funded=&retracted=on et plus de 400 articles qui sont sous investigation. Ses conclusions ne préjugent pas des décisions éditoriales Comme ici : https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312324

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849057866948268128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C64FA06D535847CD20BB4E816FD8A000EDB440C26D564BDB6EACFBB665781C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1729689389006
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18490578669482681283C64FA06D535847CD20BB4E816FD8A000EDB440C26D564BDB6EACFBB665781C1