Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-21 08:54:09 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - law is not that clear-cut and is subject to interpretation. See e.g. Roe vs Wade - 2 supreme courts gave 2 different interpretations of the exact same laws https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn It is entirely plausible that a court of law might consider that Elon Musk de facto tried to purchase votes.

Written by 51B24A3CC9986CB2A4C88694BA09CD23B9D603000604B98CC18AA88F839E9E49
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1848286641045327950
• noteId - 1848286641045327950
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 51B24A3CC9986CB2A4C88694BA09CD23B9D603000604B98CC18AA88F839E9E49
• createdAtMillis - 1729500849387
• tweetId - 1848092566916304996
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 1
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• NNN - law is not that clear-cut and is subject to interpretation. See e.g. Roe vs Wade - 2 supreme courts gave 2 different interpretations of the exact same laws https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn It is entirely plausible that a court of law might consider that Elon Musk de facto tried to purchase votes.