Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 21:49:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9EB3988D8C267F01CBCEC98589FEFBDA51CEBFE84F25ACC835FA8D1F03C85EEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - law is not that clear-cut and is subject to interpretation. See e.g. Roe vs Wade - 2 supreme courts gave 2 different interpretations of the exact same laws https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn It is entirely plausible that a court of law might consider that Elon Musk de facto tried to purchase votes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848286641045327950
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9EB3988D8C267F01CBCEC98589FEFBDA51CEBFE84F25ACC835FA8D1F03C85EEC
  • createdAtMillis - 1729547395786
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18482866410453279509EB3988D8C267F01CBCEC98589FEFBDA51CEBFE84F25ACC835FA8D1F03C85EEC