Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 15:24:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D160BAC9BF833E612FE2737DF6FD3310EA53783FCDE68AE2E5C0F793A083D5CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - law is not that clear-cut and is subject to interpretation. See e.g. Roe vs Wade - 2 supreme courts gave 2 different interpretations of the exact same laws https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn It is entirely plausible that a court of law might consider that Elon Musk de facto tried to purchase votes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848286641045327950
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D160BAC9BF833E612FE2737DF6FD3310EA53783FCDE68AE2E5C0F793A083D5CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1729524287705
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848286641045327950D160BAC9BF833E612FE2737DF6FD3310EA53783FCDE68AE2E5C0F793A083D5CA