Birdwatch Note
2024-10-14 15:00:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The notes similar to the one by 'appreciative sand duck' are dead wrong. A random sample of 1000 is absolutely a valid and predictive sample size. https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html The note which talks about the dichotomous bias is useful added context. The question is rubbish so the results are misleading.
Written by B0428E4867B82FB5BCC38BA19AC1A37D7D7973BC9CD5A6EA4F28879F73F2E752
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1845217238372004031
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1845842067982811362
- noteId - 1845842067982811362
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B0428E4867B82FB5BCC38BA19AC1A37D7D7973BC9CD5A6EA4F28879F73F2E752
- createdAtMillis - 1728918017751
- tweetId - 1845217238372004031
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The notes similar to the one by 'appreciative sand duck' are dead wrong. A random sample of 1000 is absolutely a valid and predictive sample size. https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html The note which talks about the dichotomous bias is useful added context. The question is rubbish so the results are misleading.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-14 13:23:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 13:28:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-15 00:30:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 19:41:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 10:58:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 10:26:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-15 01:42:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 22:17:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 16:51:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 12:16:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 21:59:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 15:30:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 15:12:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 13:57:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 11:22:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 10:38:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-19 13:11:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 18:15:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 15:01:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-14 11:19:04 -0500 | Rating Details |