Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 16:19:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D09E8BD7023F781DB3B5CAD246598EA98219AF30B3F396F3C829F24F11C08E27
Participant Details

Original Note:

The notes similar to the one by 'appreciative sand duck' are dead wrong. A random sample of 1000 is absolutely a valid and predictive sample size. https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html The note which talks about the dichotomous bias is useful added context. The question is rubbish so the results are misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845842067982811362
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D09E8BD7023F781DB3B5CAD246598EA98219AF30B3F396F3C829F24F11C08E27
  • createdAtMillis - 1728922744041
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845842067982811362D09E8BD7023F781DB3B5CAD246598EA98219AF30B3F396F3C829F24F11C08E27