Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 16:22:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3885189380E07C9F061969BCB1C4D35418BF8FD04BFE07A53AFF1F12C8054AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The notes similar to the one by 'appreciative sand duck' are dead wrong. A random sample of 1000 is absolutely a valid and predictive sample size. https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html The note which talks about the dichotomous bias is useful added context. The question is rubbish so the results are misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845842067982811362
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3885189380E07C9F061969BCB1C4D35418BF8FD04BFE07A53AFF1F12C8054AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1728922934095
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845842067982811362C3885189380E07C9F061969BCB1C4D35418BF8FD04BFE07A53AFF1F12C8054AE