Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-23 23:44:12 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Correct, but a study showed that donations from academics to the REP were stable around 40% up until 2k where it fell down to 10% & even less from 2020-21 (& it's the same in industry). This was caused by the REP's explicit turn away from science, not from a bias of academics. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01382-3

Written by 215F3DD7D26FD48C493AD816BAAF6BE6BD20FC1D0712E0F2FE2AF074CA7E27C2
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1838363770738917619
• noteId - 1838363770738917619
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 215F3DD7D26FD48C493AD816BAAF6BE6BD20FC1D0712E0F2FE2AF074CA7E27C2
• createdAtMillis - 1727135052749
• tweetId - 1838302465776927205
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• Correct, but a study showed that donations from academics to the REP were stable around 40% up until 2k where it fell down to 10% & even less from 2020-21 (& it's the same in industry). This was caused by the REP's explicit turn away from science, not from a bias of academics. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01382-3