Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 11:44:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD47423C1E7E142BD0A8757319E5B35423901B272AC8B3A0D82F8FF7482B8C5B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Correct, but a study showed that donations from academics to the REP were stable around 40% up until 2k where it fell down to 10% & even less from 2020-21 (& it's the same in industry). This was caused by the REP's explicit turn away from science, not from a bias of academics. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01382-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838363770738917619
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD47423C1E7E142BD0A8757319E5B35423901B272AC8B3A0D82F8FF7482B8C5B
  • createdAtMillis - 1727178284413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1838363770738917619FD47423C1E7E142BD0A8757319E5B35423901B272AC8B3A0D82F8FF7482B8C5B