Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-03-04 22:40:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The document has several features that mark it out as fake, as outlined here: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2A529E/ It uses American spellings and has grammatical errors. The FOI number and the letter format do not follow the standard formats used by the UK government for FOIs.

Written by F704FC09E050ECBFFF6159E39DECCD2315D3AA9395BA4E794B091B6C801539C6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1764716451389120846

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1764783008853237862
  • noteId - 1764783008853237862
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F704FC09E050ECBFFF6159E39DECCD2315D3AA9395BA4E794B091B6C801539C6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1709592032052
  • tweetId - 1764716451389120846
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The document has several features that mark it out as fake, as outlined here: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2A529E/ It uses American spellings and has grammatical errors. The FOI number and the letter format do not follow the standard formats used by the UK government for FOIs.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-03-04 22:40:32 UTC
(1709592032052)
2024-03-05 07:02:39 UTC
(1709622159065)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-03-07 12:28:42 UTC
(1709814522945)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-03-05 07:02:39 UTC
(1709622159065)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-03-05 09:37:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 08:52:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 08:36:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 06:56:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 01:33:44 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 01:10:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 00:03:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 20:47:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 16:59:31 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 15:27:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 08:44:30 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 08:33:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 01:35:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 00:57:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 00:56:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 23:56:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 23:40:14 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 18:57:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 18:52:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 16:51:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 05:52:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 05:20:52 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 04:07:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 01:54:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 00:47:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 23:55:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 20:04:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 19:15:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 19:05:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 18:24:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 17:33:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-04 17:04:14 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-05 03:08:28 -0600 Rating Details