Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 00:24:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 623D489B042302B905EA0868C61E4D7B8717AE62C29020F6090682254331AF0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The document has several features that mark it out as fake, as outlined here: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2A529E/ It uses American spellings and has grammatical errors. The FOI number and the letter format do not follow the standard formats used by the UK government for FOIs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764783008853237862
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 623D489B042302B905EA0868C61E4D7B8717AE62C29020F6090682254331AF0D
  • createdAtMillis - 1709598283647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764783008853237862623D489B042302B905EA0868C61E4D7B8717AE62C29020F6090682254331AF0D