Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 06:47:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 905035DF25D7AB257462D76E486A9B8F8B826113F877AD810EE53995BC05BCE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The document has several features that mark it out as fake, as outlined here: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2A529E/ It uses American spellings and has grammatical errors. The FOI number and the letter format do not follow the standard formats used by the UK government for FOIs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764783008853237862
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 905035DF25D7AB257462D76E486A9B8F8B826113F877AD810EE53995BC05BCE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1709621256839
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764783008853237862905035DF25D7AB257462D76E486A9B8F8B826113F877AD810EE53995BC05BCE5