Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 05:55:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8BFDC1A471467FE820DC60F3B67ADBFBC1E718B0245DF461875490C167C65F6B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The document has several features that mark it out as fake, as outlined here: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2A529E/ It uses American spellings and has grammatical errors. The FOI number and the letter format do not follow the standard formats used by the UK government for FOIs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764783008853237862
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8BFDC1A471467FE820DC60F3B67ADBFBC1E718B0245DF461875490C167C65F6B
  • createdAtMillis - 1709618101350
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17647830088532378628BFDC1A471467FE820DC60F3B67ADBFBC1E718B0245DF461875490C167C65F6B