Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-07 18:21:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The tweet and the attached image projects the idea that the referee denounced for manipulation of VAR images favoured Real Madrid, in reality the referee has been denounced for “harming” Real Madrid, thus a misrepresentation of facts. https://x.com/eldebate_com/status/1755186422145753117?s=46

Written by 3974CE78F3AF8D8F728F38F20C2BFFBB304282CB7B7A55FB531C319000700264
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1755258598404370900

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1755295743982641525
  • noteId - 1755295743982641525
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3974CE78F3AF8D8F728F38F20C2BFFBB304282CB7B7A55FB531C319000700264 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1707330091842
  • tweetId - 1755258598404370900
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The tweet and the attached image projects the idea that the referee denounced for manipulation of VAR images favoured Real Madrid, in reality the referee has been denounced for “harming” Real Madrid, thus a misrepresentation of facts. https://x.com/eldebate_com/status/1755186422145753117?s=46

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-07 18:21:31 UTC
(1707330091842)
2024-02-08 01:23:52 UTC
(1707355432573)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-02-08 02:46:49 UTC
(1707360409992)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-02-08 01:23:52 UTC
(1707355432573)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-07 18:09:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 16:40:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 16:34:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 15:21:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 14:36:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 14:31:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 14:20:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 14:09:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 14:01:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 13:51:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 13:16:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 13:07:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 12:59:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 12:48:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 12:33:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 12:31:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 12:27:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 12:22:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-08 12:10:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-08 11:25:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-08 01:33:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-08 00:41:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-08 04:41:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-08 04:27:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 23:33:38 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 16:52:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 16:37:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 14:34:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 13:51:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 12:59:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 12:42:11 -0600 Rating Details