Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 10:27:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F585B0D567F833586B198C54AEC402AE0225A6BE31AE2F373CB00CBAA9EB2586
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet and the attached image projects the idea that the referee denounced for manipulation of VAR images favoured Real Madrid, in reality the referee has been denounced for “harming” Real Madrid, thus a misrepresentation of facts. https://x.com/eldebate_com/status/1755186422145753117?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755295743982641525
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F585B0D567F833586B198C54AEC402AE0225A6BE31AE2F373CB00CBAA9EB2586
  • createdAtMillis - 1707388055120
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755295743982641525F585B0D567F833586B198C54AEC402AE0225A6BE31AE2F373CB00CBAA9EB2586