Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 19:51:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22723288DD3F9449E0C0236905BC6A64F89819D28B60F3A1A10FDCEA23D225A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet and the attached image projects the idea that the referee denounced for manipulation of VAR images favoured Real Madrid, in reality the referee has been denounced for “harming” Real Madrid, thus a misrepresentation of facts. https://x.com/eldebate_com/status/1755186422145753117?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755295743982641525
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22723288DD3F9449E0C0236905BC6A64F89819D28B60F3A1A10FDCEA23D225A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1707335508971
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175529574398264152522723288DD3F9449E0C0236905BC6A64F89819D28B60F3A1A10FDCEA23D225A0